MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — The state Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that a private business working on a construction project for a northern Minnesota school district does not have to make its subcontractor data public under open records laws.

The nuanced ruling in the case between Johnson Controls, Inc., and a small-town newspaper group could have significant impact on data access, experts said, as well as the public’s ability to see how government entities are spending funds.

“This decision has the potential to cause a lot of mischief,” said Jane Kirtley, media law and ethics professor at the University of Minnesota.

In 2010, the St. Louis County School District hired Milwaukee-based Johnson Controls for an $80 million school construction and renovation project. Johnson Controls hired a subcontractor to help with design. After the school district incurred extra costs, Tower-based Timberjay Newspapers asked to see the contract between Johnson Controls and its subcontractor, Architectural Resources, Inc.

Johnson Controls refused, arguing it was not subject to the Data Practices Act. The Supreme Court agreed.

“There is no provision in the Data Practices Act that makes a contract between two private businesses public,” Chief Justice Lorie Skjerven Gildea wrote for the majority.

Gildea said the government is required to provide clear notice in contracts with private businesses that the private entity is subject to open records laws if performing government functions. She said the school district did not include that notice in its contract with Johnson Controls.

“The Data Practices Act simply does not state that data held by a government contractor performing a government function are public,” the opinion said.

Marshall Helmberger, publisher and managing editor at Timberjay Newspapers, said the opinion clarifies rules going forward, and puts governments on alert that their contracts must include language that would make private entities subject to open records laws. He suggested the Legislature consider penalties for government entities that do not.

Mark Anfinson, an attorney for the newspaper, said many major contracts in the state already contain the required language, and this ruling will create “a powerful incentive” to make sure more do so in the future. He said he expects the Legislature will take a look at the Data Practices Act to avoid future issues.

The majority did not weigh in on whether Johnson Controls was providing a government function by building schools.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.